<Rant On>
So, after refusing to bump extremely fast girls up to the B class last year at the end of the season, and some complaining by the regular NEMA parents, NEMA has decided to make some changes. The womens class used to be based on performance and experience with a C class for new racers and a B class for faster racers and C class champions. Now there will be one class for 12-15 year olds with 105 two strokes and up to 150 four strokes, and the 16 and up girls will be on 125 two strokes and 250 four strokes. One NEMA official told me last year "The womens classes are the best competition in NEMA", now this has been all thrown away and a couple of faster riders will be able to win, year after year.
So, the new womens classes will be based solely on age and bike size instead of experience and overall performance. This means a 15 year old second year rider, will compete for points, sponsors, and contingency against riders having 10 or more years of experience. Some riders who have indicated to Jessi they may be racing NEMA next year are riders like Eden (National Champion) Regan (Winchester Champion) and Shannon (who smoked the B class a couple of times last season after starting with the C class a minute behind B), and several others who had things stayed the same, would have bumped up to the B class to race with riders of similar skill and experience.
NEMA was the last local racing org. to let the girls compete with riders of similar experience (like the boys do), but as one official said to me, "it's kind of a hassle" (to bump the girls up like they do the boys a tried and true system that has been working for years). Well paying $500 a week so NEMA can fill a class, and Pro riders, day riders, and National Champions can run wild on novice riders is a hassle too. As a newer race team I am not yet sure how loaded classes might effect the few sponsors we have.
At least with the classes based on performance, there was a place for less experienced riders to compete and have a chance to work hard and come home with something to show for it. The way you have set it up for this year girls who did not start racing as small children will be at a huge disadvantage.
It's too bad NEMA thinks it's "too much of a hassle" to keep the girls racing fair, fun, and "somewhat" competetive like the boys classes. You may gain a few day riders at the end of the season, but many newer riders will find racing pretty dissappointing. I doubt Jessi will, but some racers might just say screw it.
I wonder how many of you parents who had younger kids fighting for or winning championships as C class riders would have felt if your kids had to race the A and B riders, those first and second years of racing instead? You got to watch your kids work to the top of a class and then move on up to the next class, this experience has been taken from the girls. Why? "Too much of a hassle" or maybe "Don't want to lose day riders"? Either way, it's a cold shot to the girls (and their parents) who have supported NEMA to date..
<Rant Off>
Rowdy Mouse Racing, disappointed to say the least.
